|
 














 
|
|
| THE
ADHESIVE ARACHNOIDITIS SYNDROME |
|
Sarah Andreae-Jones
MB BS (Smith)
Patron of the Arachnoiditis Trust UK |

ADDENDUM - May
2000
It is no longer considered
necessary to use a contrast agent in MRI scanning provided that the scan
is T2 weighted, high resolution preferably with a stir cycle. Although
this scan is considered the diagnostic test, it must however, be remembered
that not all scans are sensitive enough to detect arachnoiditis, especially
in the early stages. In any case, as regards MRI as a tool to assess the
severity of the condition, it is comparable to using a chest X-ray to
determine the heart rate and rhythm. Therefore, other tests such as Electromyograms
(EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCV) may be very useful in assessing
the extent of nerve impairment.
Table
of Contents
Introduction
THE SCALE OF THE
PROBLEM
ARACHNOIDITIS OR
EPIDURAL FIBROSIS?
NOMENCLATURE
THE INFLAMMATORY
NATURE OF ADHESIVE ARACHNOIDITIS
PATHOLOGY
CLASSIFICATION
CAUSES
THE IATROGENIC ASPECT
OF ADHESIVE ARACHNOIDITIS
PRESERVATIVES IN
SPINAL INJECTIONS
PROGNOSIS
THE SYNDROMIC NATURE
OF SYMPTOMS IN ADHESIVE ARACHNOIDITIS (Warning: LONG)
COMPLICATIONS OF
ADHESIVE ARACHNOIDITIS
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
TREATMENT OPTIONS
(Warning: LONG)
MULTIPLE CHEMICAL
SENSITIVITY
LOOKING TO THE
FUTURE
APPENDIX I: AUTOIMMUNE
ASPECTS
APPENDIX II: SYRINGOMYELIA
ADDENDUM - May
2000
NEXT: REFERENCES
|