ASAMS WEBSITE - Reload site / Break frames

SEARCH THE SITE

ABOUT ARACHNOIDITIS
IN THE NEWS
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS AND FRIENDS
INFORMATION FOR THE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL
ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLIMENTARY THERAPIES
PATIENTS' STORIES
ARACHNOIDITIS PIONEERS
LINKS TO RELATED WEBSITES
MESSAGE BOARDS

ABOUT THIS WEBSITE
PRIVACY POLICY
LEGAL NOTICES

Kiwiwebs - Boutique Web Design & Management

 
Perspectives in Intractable Pain Management:
An analysis of current divering viewpoints

Kristin Bundy
For the National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain

Healthcare Reimbursement System's Perspective

 

As intractable pain management remains a low priority in healthcare, so does it remain a low priority in healthcare reimbursement.1,2 In the United States, many intractable pain patients are not able to comply with their intractable pain treatment because they don’t have the appropriate healthcare coverage to pay for their medication or equipment.

The United States is one of few developed countries that does not provide healthcare coverage for its citizens3; therefore, economic status ultimately determines the quality of care that patients receive.4 The following pattern has developed between patients’ economic status and the quality healthcare that is readily available to them:

Steps to overcome healthcare reimbursement limitations

 

Reference List

  1. Joranson DE, Gilson A. Controlled Substances, Medical Practice, and the Law. In: Schwartz HI, ed. Psychiatric Practice Under Fire: The Influence of Government, the Media, and Special Interests on Somatic Therapies. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994:173-194.
  2. Joranson DE, Cleeland CS, Weissman DH, Gilson AM. Opioids for chronic cancer and non-cancer pain: a survey of medical board members. Fed Bull. 1992;79(4):15-49.
  3. Joranson DE. Are health-care reimbursement policies a barrier to acute and cancer pain management? J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9(4):244-253.
  4. Saper J. Bills Would Help Manage Pain. 1997. Available at: http://www.ring.com/nprofit/lifespan/saper.htm
  5. Angarola RT, Joranson DE. Healthcare reimbursement policies: do they block acute and cancer pain management? APS Bulletin. 1994;4(5):7-9. Available at: http://www.biostat.wisc.edu/painpolicy/publicat/94apshr.htm
  6. Brand FN, Smith RT, Brand PA. Effect of economic barriers to medical care on patients’ noncompliance. Public Health Reports. 1997;92(1):72-78.
  7. Ferrell BR, Griffith H. Cost issues related to pain management: report from the cancer pain panel of the agency for health care policy and research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9(4):221-234.
  8. Wastila LJ, Bishop C. The influence of multiple copy prescription programs on analgesic utilization. J Pharm Care Pain Symptom Control. 1996;4(3):3-19.

Back to Table of Contents

Introduction
Definitions and Background Information
Governments' and State Medical Boards' Perspective
Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective
Patients’ Perspective
The Healthcare Reimbursement System’s Perspective
NEXT: Intractable Pain Management Updates

 

 

 

Home (Reload site / Break Frames) | About This Website | E-mail the Webmaster

Copyright © 2000 Arachnoiditis Sufferers Action and
Monitoring Society
(ASAMS) New Zealand Incorporated
We have made every attempt to seek permission for info on this site and appreciate the support received. Please do not reproduce without permission as it may affect our ability to provide information in the future.